Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:46:08 -0700 ieure@php.net (Ian Eure) wrote: > Standard PEAR practice is that underscores are replaced with > slashes to build the directory structure. However. this is /not/ > mentioned in the PEAR CS. I used this slightly unusual setup so > the class would conform to the SMPP specification; the thought > being that the primary document you'd need to read is the SMPP > specification, instead of weird APIs in Net_SMPP which don't > conform to spec. This is in the manual, arguing about that is more or like nuts :) > Thoughts? Other issues? I'd like to get this officially proposed > in PEPr soon. For the APIs, no idea (did not see or read yours), but the class names to path mapping is not going to be removed for your package. Have you a link to the specs? I doubt they specified a OO class model besides some std API names. For the code itself, once it's a pepr or you provide a link to the the sources, I will comment. --Pierre