Re: Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2005 22:49:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38756@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:33:29 -0700
ieure@php.net (Ian Eure) wrote:
> It's harder because you need to read the SMPP specification, then
> read additional documentation about how Net_SMPP works relative
> to that document. If Net_SMPP follows the spec closely, you only
> have to learn a few functions, instead of relearning part of the
> actual spec.
The same discussions raised many times here, read the archives if
you need more arguments.
And no, I will not download the specs unless they are freely
available.
> Your statement is demonstrably false.
> So I ask again: why does the rule apply to me and not to you?
You are wrong here and I'm not going to argue more about that.
> You also completely ignore my arguments regarding I18Nv2 and
> PHP_Compat.
I do not talk for other people, neither I use or review these
packages. For PHP_Compat, the reasons are obvious again. It has to
provide functions to be equivalent to PHP native functions, which
do not follow our CS.
This topic is closed for me. You have to apply the CS. It's not
only for new but for every new packages.
--Pierre