Re: Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client

From: Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:30:57 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38764@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Ian Eure wrote:
What I'm looking for here is a good reason why I should break adherence to the SMPP specification in favor of the PEAR CS. So far, the only argument I've gotten is "because you have to follow PEAR CS," while ignoring many significant cases where it's a bad idea, or they are ignored with no good reason.
the point is to make it possible for users and tools to easily determine the location of classes in the directory structure that are referenced in their code .. that this was a good idea was proven once more by the advent of __autoload(). regards, Lukas

« previous php.pear.dev (#38764) next »