Re: Re: Final RFC for Net_SMPP/Net_SMPP_Client

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:13:29 -0700 ieure@php.net (Ian Eure) wrote: > > This is in the manual, arguing about that is more or like > > nuts :) > > > Could you provide a citation? It's definitely not in the CS, > which is where I would expect it to be. It's also not in the > Developer Guide or New Maintainers' Guide. http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.naming.php "The PEAR class hierarchy is also reflected in the class name, each level of the hierarchy separated with a single underscore." Can it be more clear? > Whether or not they specified an OO model is not relevant. It is as you stated that our APIs (class names in this case) are weird and do not conform to spec. > > For the code itself, once it's a pepr or you provide a link to > > the the sources, I will comment. > > > It's already there, I just haven't called for votes yet. > > Net_SMPP: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=239 > > Net_SMPP_Client: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=240 I will take a look, thanks for the direct link. --Pierre