Re: Something about PEAR policy

From: Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 16:57:07 +0000
Subject: Re: Something about PEAR policy
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-907@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:58:29 +0200, Björn Schotte wrote: >there's a new discussion about migrating PHPLIB's >classes into PEAR. Where? >As Nathan Ruby says in his e-mail, >you PEAR folks don't want to have more than one class >for each category, e.g. two or more classes for DB >abstraction, templates and so on. That's not right: A few days ago we had a discussion about adding a new templating engine instead of IT[X] to PEAR: We came to the conclusion, that we could have more than one engine in PEAR, if the engines are designed for different needs. Example: We might present IT[X] for "normal, light-weight" sites and Smarty for high-traffic sites with the need of "extreme programming methods". But I think this has to be discussed for each individual category. - Martin

« previous php.pear.dev (#907) next »