RE: [PEAR-DEV] Something about PEAR policy

OK, It's a big wide world. PEAR isn't being written for YOU, it's been written for/by "US." You may join US if YOU want to. If PEAR's structure isn't for you, you've said your piece. Thank you for your imput. Buh-bye. The fact that I can't get laid any time I want disappoints me. So what do I do about it? I work at finding a compatible woman to add to my life. PEAR's one-class disappoints you, then go write your own. Sourgeforge is waiting for your genius. Set the standard and then we will follow you. PEAR's one class is AWESOME to point to as a good heirarchical OOP and code standard. We've leveraged it here at Insight in less than three months. We're learning and teaching our programmers good habits FROM PEAR, introducing them to ERROR HANDLING, etc. as opposed to a 1000 pages that are hacked together with bubble gum and glue. If you come up with something better, then COOL! More power to you. I know I'm not going to waste my time contributing to PHPLIB, but if you create a better system for PHP-PEAR-LIB, I and everyone I can influence will follow your good example. Bottom line, any more said against the structure of PEAR is you not showing any adaptability to the environment. Your objected is noted. -B -----Original Message----- From: Björn Schotte [mailto:bjoern@baer.main.de] Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 11:49 AM To: Robert Kelly Cc: Martin Jansen; pear-dev@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Something about PEAR policy * Robert Kelly wrote: > Please, let's stick to facts and not bait each other. Facts? Stating "PEAR is a structure not like CPAN, but we only want to have one class for each category" disappoints me and lets me thoroughly think of if I should promote PEAR anymore in companies and the community. -- PHP Schulungen und | International PHP Conference Schulungsmaterial: | 05. - 07.11.2001 http://thinkphp.de/ | Astron Hotel, Frankfurt http://rent-a-phpwizard.de/schulungen.php | http://www.php-kongress.de/