Re: Something about PEAR policy

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 08:51:46PM +0200, Bjrn Schotte wrote: > Personally, I would like to see PHPLIB's Template, Auth > and DB class migrating into PEAR. So what's the point > against PEARifying these classes and integrating them > into PEAR? This is, I think, the point of the whole > discussion. (Correct me, please, if I miss the point.) I don't think anyone is objecting to the inclusion of PEAR-ified PHPLIB components. The only outstanding issue is for someone to actually do the work (i.e. convert them to the established PEAR standards). I believe the original "problem" (at least, from my viewpoint) was that some people wanted to import PHPLIB wholesale (without conversion) into the PEAR cvs tree. I argued for their separation into individual components (e.g. 'template', 'auth'), but, once again, no one has done to work. -- Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member