Re: Something about PEAR policy

On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: > "nathan r. hruby" wrote: > > > > Define PEAR, that will (for the most part) catagorically answer this > > question. The allowing more classes question is a symptom of seeing trees > > instead of forest. > > One curious and inocent question: Why do you want to include PHPLIB in > PEAR? As far as I know you allready have your way of coding, developers, > a great amount of users, your own cvs, your releases distribution > system, etc. > I don't. This was a decsion made by Ulf and Kristian at the start of the year -- other folks keep bringing it up. At some later date, once phplib is more php4 friendly and PEAR has evolved and matured a bit a more, a natural union make take place; however I don't see that happening anytime soon. It would be to the detriment of both groups if a import were to happen at this moment. -n -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- nathan hruby / digital statement nathan@dstatement.com http://www.dstatement.com/ Public GPG key can be found at: http://www.dstatement.com/nathan-gpg-key.txt ED54 9A5E 132D BD01 9103 EEF3 E1B9 4738 EC90 801B -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-