Re: Function caching...
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:00:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Function caching... | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41015@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 18:53 12/12/2000, Björn Schotte wrote:
* Zeev Suraski wrote: I'm definitely not going to argue with you about this, You can't argue with because you've never used OO styleHow do you know that?
so you _can't_ _know_ if OO is far better or not.I've written quite a few applications using OO in C++ (don't start whining that C++ is a horrible OO language, PHP's object model is definitely not superior; Kristian - please, even if you think I'm wrong about this statement, I don't want to argue about it). I'd argue that even if I didn't, Kristian can't say something to the extent of 'you HAVE to use OO in your 2nd app if you want code reuse'. I can prove this is wrong even without using OO, by showing how it can easily be done in structured languages. OO's primary goal is *abstraction*. This is different from components, by the way, whose primary objective is *binary reuse*. *Code reuse* can be easily obtained in structured languages through the use of libraries. Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/