Re: finally: new authors

How about something like a notes editor? I know I spend a good bit of time going through the manual and deleting stupid notes and sometimes adding notes to the manual proper. Obviously, this may not be as worthy of recognition as some other positions, but it is an important part of the manual up-keep. --Andrew On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 09:32, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > Hi! > > As the documentation license is changed, and the current authors agreed on > adding more contributors to the list of authors / editors, I would like to > ask everybody to think of proposing himself or anybody else to be an author > or editor. For now I think we can make this with voting, and in case of > anybody has objections against someone then we need to go deeper into that > questions. Is this ok? > > I would like to avoid proposing too much guys myself, as I would probably miss > some important figures, and would be shamed ;) So please don't be shy and > propose who you think deserves to be on the authors / editors list. > > I myself would like to propose a new role 'Technical editor' or something like > this, which would fit for me and Hartmut too (in case he agrees) and Jouni > can also be moved there (in case he agrees of course). This role would be for > those who work / worked mainly on the technical staff behind, and not > primarily on the content, which as far as I see is the case for me, Hartmut > and Jouni. > > I am not going to propose anybody else here, though I know there are many guys > who deserve to be listed as authors / editors. Jump up and say! :) And also > feel free to shout out any objections. > > Goba -- Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net>