RE: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net?
| From: | Steph | Date: | Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:46:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.gtk.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-general+get-4725@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
As both Dave and Pablo said - contributions are always welcome. We don't
need an advocacy group, we need people that are prepared to spend some time
fixing the problems! If you're into writing articles, how about a bunch of
tutorials that go a bit beyond 'hello world' that we can xml-ify and add to
the manual?
erm.. connect() _is_ a function, and the search mechanism _does_ include
properties.. (??)
Back to work..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel De Gan [mailto:joeldg@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 July 2004 20:33
> To: steph@zend.com
> Cc: php-gtk-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net?
>
>
> As an opensource developer I can relate.
> I have a full-time job and can only donate a small amount each day to
> working on opensource projects.
> I am not attacking the site and saying "why isn't there a php5 version
> yet?" because I have actually just ran across one (albeit dated) here:
> http://blog.akbkhome.com/blog/categories/2_PHPGTK
>
> > That 'inability to search for functions' part is actually
> completely wrong,
>
> I was not talking about function searches, I was talking about "entire
> site" search which is available on php.net. Not to mention searching
> does not work for properties etc.. It is "just" functions. i.e my
> example of trying to find info on connect() for a gtkbutton.
>
> I gave up a long time ago attempting to get any use from the
> gtk.php.net documentation and just go to the gtk site instead.. My
> point is, people trying to look at php-gtk are being turned away left
> and right by the site.
>
> For an example from a quick google search:
> http://www.redsplash.de/blog/archives/20030901.html
>
> I obviously love php-gtk and have got a lot of people excited to use
> it through the tutorials I have written, I am just saying it sucks to
> be helping people get into it and then see them get turned off by the
> site and watch as they give up on it.
>
> Anyway, hearing peoples "thoughts" on why they don't want to use it.
> My own experiences etc. Perhaps there should be an advocacy group
> formed?
>
> -joeldg
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:09:54 +0100, Steph <steph@zend.com> wrote:
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > That 'inability to search for functions' part is actually
> completely wrong,
> > I implemented that well over a year ago. I'll admit it's not
> wonderful, but
> > it's definitely there!
> >
> > The wiki is hosted by Manuel Kiessling, I will forward your
> comments to him
> > if he doesn't pick up on them via the list. But you'll
> probably find that
> > he is also working long hours and unable to commit a great deal
> of his time
> > to php.net work at present. I know it's difficult for developers on the
> > other side of the fence to comprehend, but everything on
> php.net relies on
> > the goodwill, spare time and willingness of those involved to drop
> > everything else for it. That includes websites, documentation, software
> > development and even the underlying server administration. On
> a big project
> > (like PHP itself) there are a lot of people involved in keeping things
> > ticking over, and perhaps 30 or so who give up their entire
> social life to
> > its needs. On a small project (like PHP-GTK), you need to divide that
> > dedicated manpower by 10 or more - and you also need to keep in
> mind that
> > the development side of this particular project relies on two other OSS
> > components being in a useful and stable state.
> >
> > There's no mention of PHP 5 at all on the PHP-GTK site for the very good
> > reason that the PHP-GTK project doesn't use it yet! (There were early
> > experiments, but they were dropped because Zend Engine 2's development
> > hadn't stablized enough to work with it reliably at that point in time;
> > there was never a release at that point.) There is, however, plenty of
> > mention of PHP 5 in the SEARCHABLE list archives (via
> gtk.php.net), mostly
> > from people asking when will PHP-GTK 2 come out. Given that
> PHP 5.0.0 is
> > not quite 48 hours old at this moment in time - 'nuff said I think. You
> > can't build with blocks that aren't even hardened yet.
> >
> > Back to work..
> >
> > - Steph
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joel De Gan [mailto:joeldg@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: 15 July 2004 19:19
> > > To: php-gtk-general@lists.php.net
> > > Subject: [PHP-GTK] what is going on with gtk.php.net?
> > >
> > >
> > > First, The wiki is totally spammed...
> > > http://wiki.gtk.php.net/
> > >
> > > No mention of PHP5. At all..
> > >
> > > I wrote more on this here:
> > > http://blog.peoplesdns.com/node/view/16
> > >
> > > In particular no full site search... nothing..
> > >
> > > Actually had a junior programmer tell me this morning the reason he
> > > "couldn't" use php-gtk was because of the "... sad state of the
> > > PHPGTK
> > > website and inability to search for functions, plus nothing but links
> > > to porn in the wiki so I don't want to waste time working on something
> > > that is not maintained."
> > >
> > > Kind of frustrating when people are dismissing the entire project
> > > like that.
> > > They see my tutorials (
> > > http://lucifer.intercosmos.net/phpgtk/ and
> > > http://lucifer.intercosmos.net/tut/ ) and then send
> > > me these emails..
> > >
> > > Figured I would pass on the info.
> > > -joeldg
> > >
> > > --
> > > PHP-GTK General Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/)
> > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> > >
> >
> >