RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: IT[X] status update and a reminder
| From: | LIMBOURG Arnaud | Date: | Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:24:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: IT[X] status update and a reminder | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13748@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Well, luckily in most cases in most cases developer and maintainer
> actually *are* identical. Ulf Wendel´s packages are an exception here.
> Nevertheless, if we make that distinction that would mean:
>
> (developer != maintainer) == (maintainer == meaningless)
>
> ...which would lead to:
>
> PEAR == chaos
I'm not sure it is mathematically correct but it makes sense :)
Therefore, as a conclusion for the moment (because our mailboxes has been
under heavy stress this week-end) can we stop here with the agreement that
technically things will be added since they don't break BC if the user does
not choose the options that break BC. The cache sould indeed stay out of the
package, there is sense in that decision.
Right ?
Arnaud.