IT fork package name (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: IT[X] status update and a reminder)

25 Февраль 2003 11:35, Stig S. Bakken написал: > > > I don't see why this has to be a "fork" though, call it something > > > else, > > > HTML_Template_AB or whatever. > > > > Wow, can it be considered as a +1 for a separate package? Then I have 4 > > +1's, only one left! :] > > No it can't be considered as a +1 for anything. Propose a package name > and we'll see. I'm -1 to HTML_Template_ITMod btw. I do agree that ITMod may not be the best name for package. But my opinion is that its name should clearly indicate that it is not Yet Another Template Engine, but a package which is API- and behaviour-compatible with HTML_Template_IT[X] (after all, it has unit tests included that can prove it), but goes further than the original IT[X]. Thus I don't like HTML_Template_AB, even though it includes my initials. Possible names (i assume the HTML_Template_ prefix): ITMod (which you are against) IT2 (which, I guess lots of people will be against...) ITFork (guess not...) AIT (another...) YAIT (yet another...) ITCache (proposed by someone on this list to highlight *the* major addition) PostIT (sounds pretty silly) ITNext IT2003 (just kidding) ITPlus Other ideas are most welcome...