Re: RFC Nested Set manipulation class

At 18/03/2003 21.39 +0000, you wrote:

Martin Jansen wrote:

If there is really no chance to merge this with Tree, I'm +1 for this.

same here. I think that your class would give a great contribution to Wolfram's Tree class. I had a look at it some weeks ago, and I think that the two classes could be merged. I'm aware that a rewrite would take some time and efforts, but IMHO it's worth it. Please note that I'm *not* saying that the current classes aren't good, I'm just saying that they could gain something from each other. If you (Daniel and Wolfram) agree on this, and find some time to review it, I could help as well in the new design. Some small improvements could be done in the drivers too. Since Wolfram is an extremely pleasant person to talk with, I think an agreement could be reached without much effort, if you are willing (and have the time) to work on it. Otherwise, if no one has the time to work on the merge, a simple interface could be enough, even if my personal preference goes to the "one-class" solution :-) Best regards, Lorenzo