AW: [PEAR-DEV] RFC Nested Set manipulation class

Martin Jansen wrote: > > > Well as a said a container approach probably does not make sense fort > > > his package, so I don't see a way around having two separate > packages. > > > But this is becoming a common problem. See QueryTool etc. > > > > Why not? I think that a container approach would really make sense... > > Wolfram already started something in this direction, although some > > work is still needed. > > I agree with that. In general, we should never start moving the same > code in two different packages, just because they use different > backends. There are enough techniques to avoid this technically. Yes - Hans and me are allready working on creating a container like feature. It's no big deal :) regards -- Daniel [fatenPUNK] Khan