Re: RFC Nested Set manipulation class
| From: | Daniel Khan | Date: | Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:37:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC Nested Set manipulation class | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14423@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lorenzo Alberton wrote:
> I think that your class would give a great contribution
> to Wolfram's Tree class. I had a look at it some weeks ago, and
> I think that the two classes could be merged.
[..]
> If you (Daniel and Wolfram) agree on this, and find some time to
> review it, I could help as well in the new design. Some small
> improvements could be done in the drivers too.
> Since Wolfram is an extremely pleasant person to talk with,
> I think an agreement could be reached without much effort,
> if you are willing (and have the time) to work on it.
I am also thinking that both packages could benefit from eachother.
As I meantioned in another thread I unfortunately haven't the time to do
a full merge and to maintain it. Especially as the existing NestedSet is
used in some complex applications. So even if a merge is done I couldn't
use it for my applications cause I would have to break much of the
existing code of projects using it. Tree has an existing interface which
is used by other classes too so I would never be able to make it return
things in a way my apps expect it.
I am only able to maintain and work on the package if I am able to use
it for my company. It isn't the case that I don't want to contribute
more - I really simply don't have the time (I'm behind with some
projects) so I take the way of trying to contribute things that I have
allready in use :)
If someone takes the code, merges it into Tree and maintains it it's
really no problem. But I think that's not the point as I am sure that
Wolfram _knows_ how to implement the missing features without having to
look at my code :))
> Otherwise, if no one has the time to work on the merge, a simple
> interface could be enough, even if my personal preference goes to the
> "one-class" solution :-)
That wouldn't be a problem. Yes.
Even if I get 100 tinmes +1 I really want to hear what Wolfram thinks.
(He's not arround tonight I think)
I also think that there should be found a way to integrate/interface
with Tree.
--
Daniel [datenPUNK] Khan