AW: [PEAR-DEV] RFC Nested Set manipulation class

Wolfram Kriesing wrote: Hello Wolfram, [..] > I could imagine Daniel's class in DB_NestedSet, since it only focused > on DB (am i right Daniel?). Right - and it will stay this way. [..] > Even though I could imagine (for the good of PEAR) that classes that > work on Trees or NestedSets, which is a way of saving a tree should > have alike API's so people dont have to learn different stuff when > switching. And Daniel's class could be the class you want to go with > when people know that they *only* want to work on a DB, as opposed to > using Tree when you want the above described features .... Would you be interested to have an interface between the two packages? So people could switch more easily and NestedSet could benefit from the great approach Tree takes? In the docu there would be a note that they should use the interface adapter if they are unsure if they don't want to switch to the XML features, etc. one day. Thanks :) -- Daniel [datenPUNK] Khan