RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: API's was Benchmarks

> Anyways at the meeting we agreed that: > - redundant packages are not what we want > - merging packages and/or creating "lite" packages which > implement only > parts of the API are what we want I agree with that statement. The PEAR meeting in amsterdam outlined that. The Lite and regular versions of a package would have the same API. The regular version being more complete features-wise than the Lite. Both have a reason to live since they don't implement the same features. Yavor posts says that quite clearly. By the way, one thing that will be worked on by the qa team (iirc) is a common naming scheme. Arnaud.