RE: [PEAR-DEV] Benchmarks

From: Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:13:56 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] Benchmarks
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17082@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> From: Hans Lellelid [mailto:hans@appliedsec.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 5:13 PM > I think a component system might be nice -- have light uniform API > classes and then additional components / tools to handle the real > abstraction stuff. Kinda like MDB currently breaks out the "Manager" > classes. I think it would also make sense to break out the metadata > classes. Personally I really like the JDBC model, and myself have been > doing some work on a JDBC-like Uniform API for PHP5/ZE2 (some prelim > info at http://creole.ws). I am already on it for MDB 2.0 :-) > There are also a lot of convenience functions that maybe really don't > need to be in the core uniform API class. Things like getOne(), > getAll(), etc. (which I myself use quite frequently) should maybe be in > an optional component -- so that the core classes can be kept smaller. Agreed! I think it makes sense to minimze the convinience methods Regards, Lukas

« previous php.pear.dev (#17082) next »