Re: Benchmarks
| From: | Björn Schotte | Date: | Fri, 06 Jun 2003 06:22:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarks | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17100@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
* Hans Lellelid wrote:
> One good reason is that other PEAR components depend on DB abstraction. In
> current situation PEAR components that need to use a db either need to chose
> one layer or support both: DB_DataObjects MDB_DataObjects, DB_NestedSet
> (also supports MDB). Deciding to use a PEAR tools as the foundation for a
That's fine, but think of situations where you, as a programmer,
won't use DB_DataObjects, DB_NestedSets et al, but only some packages
like a DB package, a template package etc.
Otherwise PEAR will get like PHPLIB - a framework and not a pool of
packages.
--
ThinkPHP und Partner auf dem LinuxTag. Seien Sie mit dabei, und
lernen Sie die PHP Profis kennen! 10. - 13. Juli 2003, Karlsruhe.
* ThinkPHP sponsert das freie LAMP-Projekt auf dem LinuxTag *