Re: Benchmarks
| From: | Alexander Merz | Date: | Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:00:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarks | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17078@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Björn Schotte wrote:
I think it would also be interesting to have a simple (and fast) abstraction layer like PHPLIB::DB which is also not so bloated like the others - it was programmed with the KISS principle and not just OOP because OOP is cool.Not according to KK. :-) He wrote it as OO-Wrapper for MySQL, others start to write drivers for Oracle etc... There was no special design or priniple in the background. (he noted this in dclp last year) In general, i'm again DB_PHPLIB - it is nice from a marketing view ("PHPLib integrated in PEAR!") but brings no effort to PEAR itself. From migration point of view: no advantage. If you want to migrate from PHPLib::DB to PEAR::(M)DB, you have to do much more then search'n'replace independent of PHPLib::DB is pearified or not. Let's die PHPLib gracefully, but not as zombie in PEAR.