Package proposal misuse?

Lately I see this package proposals with "but I need more votes, please vote" If the package is not accepted within the first proposal this means that most of the active pear devs don't see the need for it or have some other reason why they didn't vote. Please respect this! Don't spam this developer mailinglist with "more votes please!" Instead improve the package, make changes and explain what you changed and maybe retry then. But just reminding of a package proposal is the wrong way... just my 2 cents... -- Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5051C9B9 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-: a--- C++ UL++>++++ P L++$>+++$ E W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP>++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r>++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------