Re: Package proposal misuse?

<paj@pearfr.org> wrote : > Amen > and thanks :) > > On 11 Aug 2003 21:37:18 +0200 > "Mirco 'meebey' Bauer" <pear-dev@meebey.net> wrote: > >> Lately I see this package proposals with "but I need more votes, >> please vote" >> If the package is not accepted within the first proposal this means >> that most of the active pear devs don't see the need for it or have >> some other reason why they didn't vote. Please respect this! Don't >> spam this developer mailinglist with "more votes please!" Instead >> improve the package, make changes and explain what you changed and >> maybe retry then. But just reminding of a package proposal is the >> wrong way... >> >> just my 2 cents... I don't totally agree. As long as we don't have a web interface for package proposals, these postings will happen all the time. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam