RE: [PEAR-DEV] Package proposal misuse?

[..] > > This of course, can never be realistically limited, and is a VITAL part > > of any package's life as a useful project, I'm sure we can all agree on > > this point :) > > Actually, that's quite easy to do, by having a restricted mailing > list for a > specific purpose of reviewing packages. This list would be > avaliable only to > a select group of people, who can make such decisions. Hm - I am always reading about 'selected people' and 'groups' and such stuff lately. Well I am pro the idea of counting developer votes and let users comment on the packages. If we say there are only 50 developers voting. 5 Votes are 10% which seems to be quite O.K. What the group should do is to keep the discussion going if there are much user comments but no developer votes at all. BTW: I did much work in political and cultural orgaizations some years ago. The thing that made me quit was that there was very much talking and discussing but no visible results. We can do endless discussions but maybe we should simply start to slightly do the changes and discuss afterwards what could be done better. Just my 2 cents -- Daniel Khan