Re: Solution: secondary maintainer

On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:51:54 -0400 Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > Sound like a good solution to everyone? I still think only about orphaned packages. Nothing else. Many important has already more than one lead and that is helpfull in many situations. >our responsibility is to answer questions in a timely manner This specific point makes me think about contracts, commercial support and so on. > and can lose CVS access. I better said here: "and will lose his CVS access" :) In other words, we can discuss this issue for the next 12months. I'm not sure that will change anything. We are talking about QA, quality and many related things. The last experiences of QA is, imho, not a success. Anyone that follow the QA list know what I'm talking about. As there is nothing there. Do we have human ressources to apply such things? (sigh, are we in a commercial company? ;-) I do not think. pierre