Re: Solution: secondary maintainer

"Limbourg Arnaud" <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire@cegetel.fr> a écrit dans le message de news:3220CFEF35C7D61180EC0002A5438BB0059426BA@ACHILLE... > > I agree (who do not?). Explain me now how to respect a > > minimum timeline > > to__answer__ questions? or even fix bugs? > > We cannot have a timeframe for support questions. Bugs on the other should > be treated as best as can be. I know it will be almost impossible to say > when a bug is going to be treated, but qa members would bug the maintainers > ;) > > > That does not exist in any opensource projects and I doubt we should > > have to be the 1st to propose this kind of "Free Commercial > > Support". Or > > do you have some nice idea to pay the support team? > > Win the lottery and distribute part of the money ? (we should begin to play > first :) > > > I mean that sounds logical to take care about orphaned > > packages. But do > > not mess with "maximum delay to post a fix, or answer a > > question", this > > is just impossible to follow. And we are not "PEAR Inc.". > > > > > PEAR needs a lot of things in insfrastructure to handle the growth. > > > > and human ressources.... > > My personal feeling is that there are people willing to help but since > nothing is clearly defined i think it makes some people uneasy on how they > should proceed. That is just a thought and i may be completely wrong ;) There you've got the point ! Thank you Arnaud. > > Arnaud. > -- Regards. M.CHAILLAN Nicolas nicos@php.net www.WorldAKT.com Hébergement de sites internets.