RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer
| From: | LIMBOURG Arnaud | Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:37:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19746@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > We cannot have a timeframe for support questions. Bugs on
> the other should
> > be treated as best as can be. I know it will be almost
> impossible to say
> > when a bug is going to be treated, but qa members would bug
> the maintainers
> > ;)
>
> Saying that people should reply within a week is totally
> unreasonable.
> It's not like people get paid for this. All those stupid
> rules make it
> less an open source project, and more a commercial entity. Of course
> there should be something done when a maintainer/developer doesn't
> respond for-a-long-time. But one week... come on.
Where do you read one week ? ;)
Anyway, i agree with you, something should be done if a package is clearly
not maintained.
Arnaud.