RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer

> I agree (who do not?). Explain me now how to respect a > minimum timeline > to__answer__ questions? or even fix bugs? We cannot have a timeframe for support questions. Bugs on the other should be treated as best as can be. I know it will be almost impossible to say when a bug is going to be treated, but qa members would bug the maintainers ;) > That does not exist in any opensource projects and I doubt we should > have to be the 1st to propose this kind of "Free Commercial > Support". Or > do you have some nice idea to pay the support team? Win the lottery and distribute part of the money ? (we should begin to play first :) > I mean that sounds logical to take care about orphaned > packages. But do > not mess with "maximum delay to post a fix, or answer a > question", this > is just impossible to follow. And we are not "PEAR Inc.". > > > PEAR needs a lot of things in insfrastructure to handle the growth. > > and human ressources.... My personal feeling is that there are people willing to help but since nothing is clearly defined i think it makes some people uneasy on how they should proceed. That is just a thought and i may be completely wrong ;) Arnaud.