RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer

From: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:04:07 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19763@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> From: Pierre-Alain Joye [mailto:paj@pearfr.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 6:44 PM > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 18:34:54 +0200 > "Lukas Smith" <smith@backendmedia.com> wrote: > > no thats really the point. > > What? And on that note I suggest that we all lean back, ponder what people have said in this thread, try to look at the other side of the argument and simply take a little breather. I haven't seen much new in a while in these threads on this topic. Of course I am not forbidding (nor would I have the means to) any further discussion. But let's stay productive :-) That is not to say that we don't need some answers on this topic. I am just saying it makes few sense to get too emotional because I have seen too many people get confused about what who said where and why in this thread already. So lets all take a chill pill and maybe tweak our proposals in private for a couple days, k? Regards, Lukas

« previous php.pear.dev (#19763) next »