Re: Solution: secondary maintainer

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:41:13 +0200 LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire@cegetel.fr> wrote: > The thing is that we cannot say "Here is PEAR, it's the official > repository for PHP. Oh, and btw, there is no support and you might not > get help or an answer and please don't bother us" I agree (who do not?). Explain me now how to respect a minimum timeline to__answer__ questions? or even fix bugs? That does not exist in any opensource projects and I doubt we should have to be the 1st to propose this kind of "Free Commercial Support". Or do you have some nice idea to pay the support team? I mean that sounds logical to take care about orphaned packages. But do not mess with "maximum delay to post a fix, or answer a question", this is just impossible to follow. And we are not "PEAR Inc.". > PEAR needs a lot of things in insfrastructure to handle the growth. and human ressources.... pierre ps: I play a bit the evil advocate, but only a bit ;)