RE: [PEAR-DEV] Solution: secondary maintainer

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Limbourg Arnaud wrote: > > I agree (who do not?). Explain me now how to respect a > > minimum timeline > > to__answer__ questions? or even fix bugs? > > We cannot have a timeframe for support questions. Bugs on the other should > be treated as best as can be. I know it will be almost impossible to say > when a bug is going to be treated, but qa members would bug the maintainers > ;) Saying that people should reply within a week is totally unreasonable. It's not like people get paid for this. All those stupid rules make it less an open source project, and more a commercial entity. Of course there should be something done when a maintainer/developer doesn't respond for-a-long-time. But one week... come on. Derick -- "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those that read the future by examining animal entrails." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/ International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------