Re: Solution: secondary maintainer
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:02:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Solution: secondary maintainer | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19725@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 14 Aug 2003 at 13:52, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:41:13 +0200
> LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire@cegetel.fr> wrote:
>
> > The thing is that we cannot say "Here is PEAR, it's the official
> > repository for PHP. Oh, and btw, there is no support and you might
> > not get help or an answer and please don't bother us"
>
> I agree (who do not?). Explain me now how to respect a minimum
> timeline to__answer__ questions? or even fix bugs?
>
> That does not exist in any opensource projects and I doubt we should
> have to be the 1st to propose this kind of "Free Commercial Support".
> Or do you have some nice idea to pay the support team?
Maybe its a bit to stupid of an idea - but might FSF or something
help out? There are already various (large) company promoting and
sponsoring open-source.
> pierre
> ps: I play a bit the evil advocate, but only a bit ;)
Only a bit :-)