Re: PEAR Forum
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2001 05:40:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Forum | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2054@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 25 Sep 2001 21:42:46 +0200, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
>PEAR has room for larger packages like Phorum (the "A" in PEAR is for
>"Application" after all), but we haven't quite figured out a way to
>integrate them yet.
>
>We need to figure out how to fit applications into the package
>namespace. I guess it cooks down to picking one of these two options:
>
>1. Each application gets its own top-level package name. Pros:
> simple. Cons: may clash with topics we may want to add later. If
> application packages have fairly unique names it shouldn't matter.
>
>2. Each application prepends something to its package name, for
> example "App_". Pros: won't clash with topics. Cons: it just
> looks silly.
>
>I'm in favor of (1).
+1. Perhaps we'll have a chance to sort this nicer when ZE2 will
be released.
- Martin