Re: PEAR Group: Package Proposal Handling Rules

Citando PEAR Group <pear-group@php.net>: >3) Votes >Only the votes of active members of the PEAR community (must have a pear web >account, however the proposer himself is not counted) are counted, however > anyone may vote. Votes require that a final choice of package name is > specified. That's a joke right? Why bother voting if i dont have a PEAR account and it will not count? Why bother saying anyone can vote, if only PEAR account owners count? I think is time to clarify the use of "active members of the PEAR community". I think of myself as a "active members of the Linux community" but i dont remember have signed for a account in the last 8 or 9 years of activy. But, boy, I read/wrote tons of e-mails and code, and spent hours in flame wars, just because I think that is a "community" way of doing things. Saying so, i would like to sugest a modification on item 3: 3) Only the votes of active developers, with a active PEAR account, counts, with exception of the proposer, if its already a active developer. Votes require a final choice of package name being specified. The analysis of anyone else is welcome to help developers decide. Regards S. Rocha ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/