RE: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR Group: Package Proposal Handling Rules

Zitat von Lukas Smith <smith@backendmedia.com>: > Finally we don't see a reason to rush acceptance of packages. We hope > that every proposal gets peer review and a good name. Also we are trying > to get rid of issues where someones +1 becomes obsolete because of a > request by someone else. So the idea is to have things worked out as > much as possible before the actual voting takes place. While this is the right way IMO, I'm not so sure if the package name should really be worked out at this stage. It doesn't make much sense to me to discuss the package name for a few days if the package isn't accepted at the end. OTHO once the package is accepted it's rather unlikely that the whole package will fail because we can't agree on a name. Jan. -- http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft