Re: Image_Text mess in CVS

From: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:52:00 +0000
Subject: Re: Image_Text mess in CVS
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-23525@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
<zitiere wer="Stig S. Bakken"> > Just maintain a second pear install tree for testing: > alias peartest="pear -f ~/.peartestrc" > T=~/peartest > mkdir $T > peartest -d bin_dir=$T/bin -d doc_dir=$T/docs -d ext_dir=$T/libexec \ > -d php_dir=$T/lib/php -d data_dir=$T/data -d test_dir=$T/tests > Now you can do "peartest install package.xml" etc. That would definitly be a clean solution. But I guess it's unmanagable in PEAR. CVS is a repository for deleopement. And package.xml is mostly touched only short befor a release. So, I guess in most cases, the package.xml residing in CVS is not valid for the code. I would allways have to check package.xml before I can do that. And that's quite more uncomfortable than handling ln's. > If you use "pear run-tests", the current directory is prepended to the > include_path, so if you follow the convention of having a file structure > within your package directory, run-tests will do the work for you. Most times during developement I do not use pear command (sorry!). I have a repository, where I get my sources included from (not only those I'm developing on, but even depending packages, etc.) and a browser / cli script to test. And I guess, that's the way most developers do. Am I wrong? Regards, Toby -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>

« previous php.pear.dev (#23525) next »