Re: Image_Text mess in CVS

On 12 Nov 2003 at 11:18, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote : > > > If we come up with correct ways for handling files in CVS / on > > harddisk and about the filenames I'd volunteer to have a look at the > > current package to try to help solve some inconsistencies with the > > where possible. (Background: You can't move / rename files in CVS > > without loosing CVS-history for that file - so renaming / moving > > should be done directly on the server via SSH). > > That's not the point. The CVS structure doesn't have to reflect your > test environment. First you test your code then you commit the changes > to CVS. You shouldn't test your code directly in CVS unless you want > to add mess to your repository. The proposed changes are wrong. Please also have a look at Archive_Tar: http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/pear/Archive_Tar?login=2 Seems like Toby didn't invent the wheel again - there it's already done the same way (having Archive_Tar/Archive/Tar.php etc.). I don't see the problems when using a directory/file-layout like this in CVS ... and as has been mentioned on the list there are even a few good sides of doing it this way. Stefan