Re: Image_Text mess in CVS

On 12 Nov 2003 at 17:58, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote : > > > On 12 Nov 2003 at 11:18, Bertrand Mansion wrote: > > > >> <stefan@neufeind.net> wrote : > >> > >>> If we come up with correct ways for handling files in CVS / on > >>> harddisk and about the filenames I'd volunteer to have a look at > >>> the current package to try to help solve some inconsistencies with > >>> the where possible. (Background: You can't move / rename files in > >>> CVS without loosing CVS-history for that file - so renaming / > >>> moving should be done directly on the server via SSH). > >> > >> That's not the point. The CVS structure doesn't have to reflect > >> your test environment. First you test your code then you commit the > >> changes to CVS. You shouldn't test your code directly in CVS unless > >> you want to add mess to your repository. The proposed changes are > >> wrong. > > > > Please also have a look at Archive_Tar: > > http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/pear/Archive_Tar?login=2 > > > > Seems like Toby didn't invent the wheel again - there it's already > > done the same way (having Archive_Tar/Archive/Tar.php etc.). > > > > I don't see the problems when using a directory/file-layout like > > this in CVS ... and as has been mentioned on the list there are even > > a few good sides of doing it this way. > > IMO, that's just an unintended mistake that Vincent made when he > started using PEAR CVS, because he didn't do it again for Archive_Zip. Hmm, oh - just thought he had the same brilliant idea - because it's quite handy in my eyes <honest!>. > Remember how you messed with your first commits (in Validate for > example...). If I hang myself by the balls to a tree, will you do the > same ? (I like the image :) I also like the image of *you* ... well ... Just a joke. (!!!!!) > Anyway, feel free to do whatever you please. > I am not here to do the Polizei and PEAR Group didn't express a strong > opinion against your proposals. So, yipee, let's f*ck up the tree ! :) Could we maybe keep this a bit more constructive? What real objections are there against Tobi's idea? Not that I intend to take it over right now - just that I understand why he did it and why it might be a good solution. Stefan