Re: MVC revisted
| From: | David Costa | Date: | Tue, 11 May 2004 20:17:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: MVC revisted | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29109@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On May 11, 2004, at 10:01 PM, Tony Bibbs wrote:
Before too much flaming, I'd like to hear more about the PAL mentioned by Phillipe or the channel concept discussed by Greg. Obviously this isn't the first time this has been brought up which means it might be worth considering an alternative route. Greg should be getting back to me but I'd be interested in hearing if a repository related to PEAR that houses frameworks makes some sense. --Tonyyou can already make your package to install via the PEAR installer e.g. I use http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=Yawp and Savant http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=Savant and both show up on the pear info page of my site (http://www.dotgeek.org/pear.php) I would agree with other developers. By definition a framework is not a component and makes little sense on PEAR. All the best in your endeavors, Cheers David Costa
Tobias Schlitt wrote:Hi! PEAR defines itself (as discussed multiple times here) as a loosly collections of components and classes. A framework is in no way a component. We will not start adding any kind of framework at any time. Sorry, no chance. Regards, Toby-- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php