Re: Re: Templates in PEAR

Hi Alexey Borzov, you wrote: > Hi! > > Michael Wallner wrote: > >>>> If each current lead of the template engines that currently >>>> exists in pear are joining a team, nobody will be left out, if >>>> that is your fear. >>> >>> >>> >>> I prefer to choose the teams to join *myself*. Thanks. >> >> >> I wont force you to do anything, Alexey :) This sentence should >> have been read with *MAY* in mind. > > > Ok, let me rephrase. If someone wishes to start work on a > mega-super-template wrapper, more power to them. But I'd suggest > coming up with some working prototype first, before starting to order > the devs of the existing engines around. Very true - a crew of volunteering developers would be *the* pre-condition. I wont order anything to maintainers despite looking after their packages. Quoting myself: ~~~ Well, I agree fully to Joshua, but I'm afraid, that this is yet another great vision PEAR will be stuck at for months... Do we have a couple of devs that are willing to develop *together* a great and shiny HTML_Template? ~~~ > I don't believe in this unification proposal, as the templates that > are now in PEAR follow at least two fundamentally different > approaches. That would have to be worked out. Don't take me wrong Alexey, I thought we're talking about an idea, not about a forcing rule that apllies immediately. It even wont ever happen if there are no people feeling the same about that idea. > And I don't quite understand what the fuss is about. Are people > confused? Are there some problems with using all these template > engines? I guess it can be called idea or sudden inspiration or whatever... :) Regards, -- Michael - < mike(@)php.net >

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc