Re: Re: Templates in PEAR
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 02 Jun 2004 19:06:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Templates in PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29926@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
Klaus Guenther wrote:Subpackages are a convinience feature. Nothing more. So not having them is no reason not to separate modules of a given package into a separate package. Actually I have been pondering doing this for MDB2. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07Should users consider PEAR bloatware? As soon as we have sub-packages, we could consider it. And it's nice if you get special templates and areBy the way, subpackages are currently being thrown around as a kind of "task" - so it will be encompassed in greater application support. Needless to say, this is a long ways off from actual implementation, channels will come first.