Re: [PEPr] Call for votes on XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)

Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > I will be undiplomatic, I do not care what people said or not. The > fact is that Daniel maintains this package. Or are you saying that > I can come with a major version of any package in pear, write a > proposal, find 5 people to vote unconditionnal +1 and I'm done with > my world domination step #1? > > So either you step back and wait Daniel's feedback, or I act as I > should have did in may, remove this proposal. I hope you will > choose the soft way. Sorry, I do not feel I have done nothing wrong. Daniel hasn't said he feels wrongdoing about this either. He expressed his desire to comment on the package, and I replied he is welcome to do so. I'm sorry if this sounds like a turf war. I'm not interested in turf wars. This is a package proposal, not a world domination scheme. If you wish to remove the proposal before others can discuss it, I will not react, and I will not re-propose the package. I can cope with technical discussion. I proved it in the past, and adapted XML_RPC2 to correct mistakes PEAR developers pointed in my approach. I can't and refuse to cope with political arguments. This is politics, and it is sad if PEAR loses good code on political grounds. I repeat: I have done everything by the book. I checked there was no intention of XML_RPC developers of writing a PHP5 version, and got the ok of one of them. I don't care if Daniel feels offended by this (I don't even believe he feels offended, as he didn't say a word about it). All in all, you're creating what we here call a "storm in a glass of water". However, if you do have the power to kill the proposal and you think you're doing the right thing, who am I to prevent you? By all means, go ahead. Cheers, -- Sérgio Carvalho