Re: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)

From: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:44:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38114@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Bertrand Mansion wrote: > Bertrand Mansion (http://pear.php.net/user/mansion) has commented on the proposal for > XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal). > > Comment: > > Do you really need to depend on Curl ? You'll agree it's much much easier to write HTTP client code using cURL as opposed to direct socket manipulation. Moreso, when I plan to implement HTTPS certificate authentication (I need it internally at my company). In an ideal world XML_RPC2 would depend on an external library for HTTP client code. The aim is to depend on HTTP_Request. Unfortunately, HTTP_Request is not E_STRICT compliant, and borks all unit tests. So, the compromise is to substitute HTTP_Request with a slimmed down utility class (XML_RPC2_Util_HTTPRequest) and switch over once HTTP_Request goes PHP5. -- Sérgio

« previous php.pear.dev (#38114) next »