Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)

On 6/28/2005 2:23 PM, Pierre-Alain Joye spake the following words: > On 28 Jun 2005 12:08:17 -0000 > klaus@capitalfocus.org ("Klaus Guenther") wrote: >>Klaus Guenther (http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur) has voted +1 on >>the proposal for XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal). >> >>Proposal information: >>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=259 >>Vote information: >>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=259&handle=thesaur >> >>Comment: >> >>Since Greg signs off on this, I'm voting +1 (which as has often >>been pointed out is technically unnecessary) pending review by >>Dan and the rest. Nice to see progress :) > > No progress but irrespect. Greg or Martin being wrong on this > point. The package can be technically perfect, the way Sergio > proposed it is the worst that one can do. You're absolutely right. What a new major version needs is peer review, not a vote. Since PEPr doesn't allow retracting votes, I'm officially retracting mine after talking with Pierre on #pear. This is not to be construed as saying that I disagree with the code or anything. Sergio simply didn't go about it the right way. > I just mailed Dan to urge him to comment, I will wait a couple of > days before acting (see my previous post, Sergio refused to wait). Sergio, could you please wait for Dan's comments? Klaus