Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)
| From: | Sergio Carvalho | Date: | Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:47:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38388@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Bertrand Mansion wrote:
> Bertrand Mansion (http://pear.php.net/user/mansion) has voted +1 on the proposal for
> XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal).
>
> Proposal information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=259
> Vote information:
>
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=259&handle=mansion
>
> Comment:
>
> XML_RPC2_Backend_Php_Response::encode()
>
> XML_RPC2_Backend_Php_Response::encodeFault()
>
> Please get rid of short php tags (<?=) which might not be supported by
> everyone. Also, it might be cleaner to get rid of ob_ functions in
> general.
I can easily get rid of short tags, but output buffering isn't so
simple. If ob is that uncommon, I guess I can use heredoc syntax, but
the code loses a bit on readability.
> Please implement a new HTTPRequest object that does not depend on cURL.
The current HTTPRequest is a slimmed down, API-compatible, HTTP_Request.
The objective is to use the HTTP_Request package once it becomes
E_STRICT compliant.
I'd gladly port, or help to port, HTTP_Request to PHP5. That is,
however, a task outside the scope of this package.
> Try to always put the { below the method name. You forgot to do so in a
> few places.
I'll do a second pass at that. That one counter-CG habbit is hard to lose.
> Thanks, the rest of your code is ok for me.
Thanks for the thorough review.
Cheers,
--
Sérgio Carvalho