Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for XML::XML_RPC2 (reproposal)

Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: >> >>What you refuse to understand is that this vote won't produce an >>automatic acceptance of the package. > > You totally miss the ideas of pepr then. And people votes to get > in. You seem way too centered in the idea of getting "in". I already maintain PEAR packages, I'm not trying to access some elite club... > What when you have 5x +1 and Dan says no? When??? Well, if it gets +5, then the package is technically good. The development was publicly announced, recurrently, in the list for over half a year now, with no motives against its development exposed by anyone. I'm at a loss looking for other motives for refusal. Do you know any that I don't? >>It is merely a public review so that I can then talk to >>maintainers of XML_RPC. > > This is the idea behing this list, not flames war or pollitics. So, let's stop this, shall we? Let Dan speak for himself. I still don't think he'll have any kind of opposition against the package. Cheers, -- Sérgio Carvalho