Re: [PEPr] -1 for Authentication::OpenID

Jonathan Daugherty wrote:

In other words, you need to update the proposal, not post changes to the list.

I'd certainly update the proposal if it weren't in call-for-votes mode, but no changes are allowed. Ooops, true !

What means you called for vote too quick. It's a problem in the proposition system, no or very few comment generally does not mean it's perfect but more that people oversaw it or were buzy and could not yet find time to answer. That's peculiarly true for your proposal as a full inspection of it (as it is) costs a few minutes/hours as it is very rich: 110 files in the tgz , imho again, not clearly organized. That's unfortunate here as you right made a "last call for comments" before calling for vote, what is the right way to do (that should even be mandatory). Just perhaps, 1 week delay is very short, don't forget we all do it in our "free" time. I would also note you did not or very partially adress the comments you got in the right phase, nor discussed them case you did not agree. That said, a -1 vote is no infamy, no comdamnation and does not prohibit an acceptation (it's the sum of votes making the result). For myself, I look forward to see your package coming in PEAR in a right form. Bon courage ! -- toggg