Re: lambda() naming
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Sat, 03 Jun 2000 23:18:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: lambda() naming | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-20148@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> In fact, I don't believe in such thing as "intuitive function
> name". That's almost as "intuitive machine code". Function name is an
> axiom, you look it on the manual and learn it. You will do it anyway to
> know arguments, BTW :) And lambda is much shorter to type than
> anonymous_function. :)
Yes, lambda() has a well-defined meaning in computer science, why should
we dumb it down?
-Andrei