Re: Will PHP ever "grow up" and have threading?
| From: | Peter Lind | Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:43:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Will PHP ever "grow up" and have threading? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-303217@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 24 March 2010 10:38, Rene Veerman <rene7705@gmail.com> wrote:
> and if threading and shared memory aren't implemented, then hey, the
> php dev team can build something else in that these naysayers DO need
> eh...
>
> lol...
Do you have any idea how sad and pathetic you come across? I'm very
sorry to say this, but really, now's the time to stop posting and step
back, take a deep breath, then focus on something else.
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Rene Veerman <rene7705@gmail.com> wrote:
>> unless the actual php development team would like to weigh in on this
>> matter of course.
>>
>> yes, i do consider it that important.
>>
>> these nay-sayers usually also lobby the dev-team to such extent that
>> these features would actually not make it into php.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rene Veerman <rene7705@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> php is not a hammer, its a programming language.
>>>
>>> one that i feel needs to stay ahead of the computing trend if it is to
>>> be considered a language for large scale applications.
>>>
>>> but you nay-sayers here have convinced me; i'll be shopping for
>>> another language with which to serve my applications and the weboutput
>>> they produce..
>>>
>>> thanks for opening my eyes and telling to abandon ship in time.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Stuart Dallas <stuttle@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Heh, you guys are funny!
>>>>
>>>> On 24 Mar 2010, at 08:58, Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Rene Veerman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> popular : facebook youtube etc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rene, I must be missing something here. That sort of size implies
>>>>>> millions in advertising revenue, so why are we discussing how much
>>>>>> performance we can squeeze out of a single box? I mean, I'm all for
>>>>>> efficient use of system resources, but if I have a semi-scalable
>>>>>> application, it's a lot easier just getting another box than trying to
>>>>>> change the implementation language. OTOH, if my design is not
>>>>>> scalable, it's probably also easier to redo it than trying to change
>>>>>> the implementation language.
>>>>>
>>>>> again:
>>>>> a) you're determining the contents of my toolset, without it affecting
>>>>> you at all. the way you want it php will degrade into a toy language.
>>>>
>>>> And how exactly are you defining a toy language? If you want features like
>>>> threading, why not switch to a language that already supports it?
>>>>
>>>>> b) i will aim for all possible decreases in development time and
>>>>> operating costs during, not only in the grow phase but also in hard
>>>>> economic times. any business person knows why.
>>>>
>>>> Yup, this is very good practice, but deciding that one particular tool is the only
>>>> option is a fatal business decision. Use the right tool for the job!
>>>>
>>>> What you're trying to do here is akin to taking a hammer and whittling a
>>>> screwdriver in to the handle. It's ridiculously inefficient, and imo, pretty stupid.
>>>>
>>>>>>> and you're still trying to impose a toolset on me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't think I was - you're the one who seem to be fixed on PHP
>>>>>> as the
>>>>>> only solution, and advocating that it be enhanced to suit your
>>>>>> purposes.
>>>>>
>>>>> no, php is just my toolset of choice, and i think it should grow with
>>>>> the times and support threading and shared memory.
>>>>> maybe even a few cool features to enable use-as-a-cloud.
>>>>
>>>> PHP is a hammer, and a bloody good one at that, but you seem to want it to be a
>>>> tool shed. Accept that it's a hammer, go visit a DIY store, find the right tool for the job and
>>>> get on with your life!
>>>>
>>>> The fact is that even if we all agree that PHP needs threading, and one or more
>>>> people start working on putting it into the core, it will likely be many months before you see any
>>>> sight of a working version, and even longer before you see a stable release.
>>>>
>>>> -Stuart
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://stut.net/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
<hype>
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51
BeWelcome: Fake51
Couchsurfing: Fake51
</hype>