Re: Will PHP ever "grow up" and have threading?
| From: | Peter Lind | Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:35:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Will PHP ever "grow up" and have threading? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-303485@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 25 March 2010 23:23, Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There's the code example from that same link. You may have executed
> the queries asynchronously, but the process of the results are still
> serial. Let's face it, all of our processing of queries are not a
> simple echo. We iterate/loop through the results and display them in
> the desired format. Having execute the query and the processing of
> the result in threads/parallel, you get the real performance boost
> which I've been trying to convey the concept of serial versus
> parallel.
Actually, you haven't mentioned the processing as part of what the
threads do until now. I see your point though: if you split that part
off, you might gain some performance, that would otherwise be hard to
get at.
I wonder though, if the performance is worth it in the tradeoff for
the maintenance nightmare it is when you split out content processing
between 10 different threads. I wouldn't personally touch it unless I
had no other option, but that's just my opinion.
Anyway, I don't think either of us will change point of view much at
this point - so we should probably just give the mailing list a rest
by now. Thanks for the posts, it's been interesting to read :)
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
<hype>
WWW: http://plphp.dk / http://plind.dk
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/plind
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fake51
BeWelcome: Fake51
Couchsurfing: Fake51
</hype>